Part 3
The New Human
We need to think about what it is like to be a member of a synthesized
species which is going through a special case of evolution, a rapid
metamorphosis, where we can actually determine our own evolutionary direction,
when the ramifications of that unthinkable thought are now about to bring
about a turning point in our history. It is about the new civilization
we are about to create out of the new planetary vision.
Let us postulate that we have broken the godspell, we have arrived
at a consensual, planetary, understanding and definition of the generic
human as a genetically engineered species now coming out of racial adolescence
into species first maturity, the individual cognizant of the ability
to control and direct the nature and trajectory of his and her own personal
evolution and able and expected to contribute to the collective consciousness
and determination of the racial evolutionary trajectory.
The awareness and comprehension of this fundamental, generic,
racial self knowledgeI have called genetic enlightenment. By "genetic
enlightenment" I mean what it is like once you have broken the godspell,
the deepest dye in the fabrics of both Eastern and Western culture.
Many seemingly enigmatic items are resolved and there is a great deal
to be done. It becomes immediately clear that we can move beyond both
eastern and western metaphor; beyond religion, atheism, the old
new age; beyond Jungian archetypal and mythological interpretation, beyond
our strange, dangerous and contradictory mix of mammalian, turfish, violent
theo-political politics and compassionate ideals. We will finally be ready
for alien contact and interaction and matriculation into stellar society.
We can reach a planetary unity we have never known before and a peace so
profound it will be almost humorous. How long will it take?
Probably as long as we have lived under our Constitution.
The Trajectory of Realevolution
A cardinal result of our confusion
about who and what we are causes us to be at a loss as to what the thrust
and direction, the trajectory of that evolutionary dynamic might be.
When we, collectively, recognize the validity of the new paradigm and
restore our true history to ourselves we will gain a critical major advantage
in that we will be positioned to understand not only our unique synthetic
nature but our unique evolutionary trajectory. This will mark a cardinal
turning point in our history.
Once the locked-in, slave-code legacies and the conflicts they
engender, both species wise and in the individual, are seen for what
they really are, it becomes clear that the thrust, the direction, of
our Realevolution is toward greater and greater expansion of freedom, compassion,
understanding, cooperation, intelligence, consciousness, dimensional
perception, conscious personal and species orchestration and control.
It raises and enhances the individual’s level of importance, the scope
of the individual’s choices and enlarges the arena of exploration. It
points towards immortality and beyond, to transforms of our nature hardly
imaginable now. The message is that liberated human nature and existence
is open ended, forward creative, poetic, rhapsodic, expanding, exciting
and enticing.
The Demographics of Our Realevolution
The evolutionary demographic
profile of the species, at any given time, tends to be that of a bell
curve. The segments of the bell curve are composed of gene pools with
different focuses and different functions. Perhaps two percent
of the population, at any given time, will be located at the very leading
edge of the curve. These are the futants, those who are genetically programmed
to be the evolutionary scouts of future dimensions, scenarios, and potentials.
Rather than kill them, jail them, shun them, we had better learn to recognize
their function, sort out the valuable parts of their reports of the future,
and honor their contribution to the evolutionary progress of our species.
IQ Meets CQ....and EQ?
Genetic enlightenment will
afford derivative major advantages in psychology, sociology, and education.
Once recognizing the nature and direction of our realevolution
we will be positioned to understand the details of its mechanism.
The current agenda of the DNA intelligence is to produce neurological
systems that can use themselves as an instrument and bodies sophisticated
enough to house them. There are a number of survival functions necessary
to protect, preserve, and further that goal and the species. These functions
are accomplished by specific gene pools of individuals. Individual,
personal realevolution recapitulates the realevolution of our species
and this involves the individual moving through different gene pools at
different ages and stages. Education is most effectively accomplished
in gene pool contexts at the time the child, adolescent or adult is evolving
through or specializing in a particular gene pool.
IQ, intelligent quotient is defined in realevolutionary terms
as an estimate of the degree of proficiency of an entity to receive,
process, transmit information from external and internal sources, testable
and measurable against a relative peer scale.
Just as one can test to determine if an entity possesses some
degree of intelligence so one can test to determine if an entity has
some degree of consciousness. Just as with intelligence, once determined
in an entity, one can devise relative criteria and scales to measure
the extent of the spectrum of awarenesses and the degree and focus of
each kind of awareness, its integration and the degree of conscious use
by the entity of its input and data. Let us call this the consciousness
quotient: CQ.
How primitive are we still? Tests for a consciousness quotient,
CQ, do not seem to be a concept with which our collective consciousness
is comfortable just yet. Not just a test to determine a verifiable state
of awareness. Not just a test to see if we can be Turinged by some program
or entity. A test of consciousness quotient would determine the entire
range of awarenesses of the entity, human or otherwise, and the degree
of development and intensity, quality and focus of each part of that
spectrum.
The democratic ideal is twisted with regard to consciousness
as it is with IQ. Yes, all humans are created equal as far as their human
rights are concerned but we all don’t have the same abilities or degrees
of capabilities or intelligence or consciousness. Somehow, such a recognition
is seen by some to be less than politically correct, or a denigration
of some individuals.
How primitive are we? If the notion of a CQ is touchy, try EQ,
an individual’s evolutionary quotient, and a relative scale measure of
an individual’s evolutionary development and potential. We continually
make ad hoc judgments, many times for the sake of our own security and
safety, about the relatively evolved or devolved physical, mental and
consciousness characteristics and signals of others just as we are doing
continually about their manifest IQ. A parent or teacher or psychologist
expects a statement like “This person has a higher IQ than that person”
to be sophisticated and socially acceptable. If, however, one dares broach
the notion of a consciousness quotient, CQ, communicatory flags go up; there
is disconcertion, confusion, and even conflict. Advance the concept
of an EQ, an evolutionary developmental quotient, and things get really
squirrelly. Once we are adjusted to the concept of the individual, from conception
on, recapitulating the stages of species evolution, we will begin to take
the notions of CQ and EQ as given. We will need them to recognize
the developmental stage of a child or adult in order to determine in which
gene pool context he or she should be educated in or contribute to at that
point, thereby most effectively promoting and accelerating her or his personal
realevolution.
The recognition that the stages of realevolution are stages
of conscious evolution will facilitate the resolution of the perennial
academic problem involving other than “normal” states of consciousness.
At this primitive stage, we cannot even agree on what constitutes the
real or “legitimate” elements of the spectrum of human consciousness. If
an investigator’s paradigm --- or consciousness --- does not happen to
have the capacity for some perception, sensitivity or ability, its reality
is often denied, a priori, in other humans. It may not even be admitted
for testing or the investigation turned into an inquisition using magicians
as the inquisitors instead of Dominican monks in the public square of
some “learning” channel. We argue about the reality of various kinds of
extrasensory perception, non-local communication, transcendental states,
and perceivable dimensionalities and never seem to be able to come to definitive
conclusions --- unless, of course, the Pentagon needs remote viewers. Consciousness
in, consciousness out. Once we have understood realevolution as essentially
a process of consciousness development, the paranormal modalities will be
recognized as advanced, evolved functions along the realevolutionary trajectory.
Timothy Leary, Ph.D., the Tesla of psychology, developed an
elegant schema to identify the types of consciousness at each stage
of realevolution, past, present and coming. I have included a summary
of it as Appendix B. It is
a road and flight map of realevolution. Note well the simple but
profound advice: “The answer to all human problems is to recognize your
genetic stage, go to the place where your genetic peers hang out, and
in that secure place prepare yourself for the future stages inevitably
awaiting you.”
We need institutions and governments that are built intrinsically
on and for those characteristics, to support and further the evolution
of the species and the individual as a primary function. The structure
of constitutions and laws should promote the greatest degree of freedom
of expansion and exploration by the individual and the species.
Well, you say, here in the U. S., the Constitution is an advanced
and enlightened document, which has solved many of those problems,
at least in this country. I submit that the Constitution, certainly advanced
and relatively enlightened when it was conceived and put in place, was
an ingenious solution, created by deists, for maintaining some semblance
of peace between the Colonial religious factions, restraining the religious
mayhem always under the surface. However, there is no indication of any
anticipation that there would ever be a resolution of those differences,
no anticipation of a common definition and understanding of human nature.
The Constitution, as unique and effective as it is as a set of rules of
order in a primitive situation, has become a locked-in legacy. It barely
continues to balance the powers, long term, and prevent the takeover of
the government and imposition of theocracy or fascism.
The extraordinary element remaining is the seed of evolutionary
suggestion clearly intended by its authors as expressed by Jefferson
when he said:
“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and
constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the
progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened,
as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions
change. With the change of circumstances, institutions must advance
also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to
wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to
remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.”
A planetarily consensual conception of the generically human
will enable us to derive improved forms of constitutions and develop
systems of representation of individual input and voting far more adequate
and accurate than our current systems of representation by strangers.
That would be a first step. They will render outmoded our current systems
that are modeled, to one degree or another on the residue of slave-code
religious rules. They will be determined democratically by direct input
from the entire population and constructed to further and abet the realevolution
of the individual and the species. We, in the U.S., are in need of a second
Constitution. To that purpose I have included a proposal in Appendix C. The essence of
the proposal is that we now have a tool, through the relatively awesome
power of the electronic medium, in the “open source” approach to programming
and system development that will afford us a means to moving beyond outmoded
representative government by the mediocracy to far more intelligent forms
by direct input by each citizen.
It is evident that the current serious crisis of world peace
is largely due to the “my god is better than your god” conflicts, the
sad playing out of the same kind of wars in which we were used as pawns
by the Anunnaki. The second major factor is economic: competition
for limited resources which is further exacerbated by the corruption
of the powerful oppressing the weak. How primitive are we? We need
only examine every economic system attempted or implemented through
history to comprehend that all forms, to this point, have been successful
only to a point in limited circumstances. Every serious economic and
political structuring has proven to have benefits but equally serious
limitations and drawbacks due to conflicts over what and who a human
individual is and, therefore, what the rights of the individual
are relative to other humans and the state; what is considered moral,
just; whether there should be winners and losers; who should be
taken care of and why; and, to put it in modern academic jargon,
who is the “other”. Certainly, the potential for human degeneracy is always
extant and partly at cause, but the more fundamental Babel-factoring of
our species still hinders us from taking conscious part in our realevolution
which is on schedule regardless. The new paradigm will, eventually, see
our political and economic systems as mirroring our rapid though confused
realevolutionary stages and consciously and intelligently and compassionately
developing evolving, dynamic systems commensurate with our now and future
trajectory. Artificial intelligence, ironically, will probably
have to be used to determine rapidly adjusting economic systems
for the benefit of all.
It's All Over For The Current Consensual
Worldview
Actually, it has been "all over"
for some time now. Several works by various authors may be noted as
turning point markers just previous to the introduction of Sitchin's thesis.
Joseph Campbell's master work, The Masks of God, surveyed
and elucidated the entire field of mythology. He accepted the basic
premise that the "gods" were mythological. However, he was compelled to question
the basic working premise of mythology that mythology had arisen through the
naive proto-"science" of early human minds attributing human characteristics
on the sun, moon, stars, and the phenomena of nature: storms, lightning,
winds, etc. He found very signicant the fact that the genealogies
of the "gods" were the same in India as they were in the Norse countries ----
the names were different because of the difference in languages but the genealogical
relationships were identical ---- and had to conclude that something
had begun in the "little Sumerian mud garden" and spread to the rest
of the world. This was totally contradictory of the working premise
of then and current mythology but he let it go at noting its significance.
This was a demarcation for the introduction of Sitchin's radical paradigm.
In 1976 Julian Jaynes of Princeton published his The Origin of Consciousness
In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, examining the evolution of human
consciousness in an erudite study that covered the classics, mythology,
archaeology, religion and history. He accepted the unquestioned
premise that the "gods" were mythological as did Campbell. He concludes
that, because previous to 1250 B.C. humans claimed to talk to the gods, get
instructions from them, hear them speak, worked for them, all
men previous to that turning point in time, must have been hallucinating
schizophrenes because, the gods being unreal, mythic, they must have been
hearing them in their heads (!!). In retrospect , Jaynes' work can
be seen as the last extreme effort to make professional, academic sense out
of the puzzling history where the only two choices were the gods were imaginary,
mythic or they were real. it took Sitchin to provide the definitive
validity of the "real" choice.
Sitchin first published also in 1976 and has produced some nine volumes
since.
In 1996 Samuel P. Huntington published The Clash of Civilizations and the
Remaking Of World Order. Mr. Huntington presents a paradigm of global
politics in terms of the interactions between civilizations, a "civilizational"
approach, with the intention or providing insight into how to avoid
the clashes between civilizations which he sees as the greatest threat to
world peace and, conversely, how "an international order based on civilizations
is the surest safeguard against world war".
The concept of a new world order, in itself, can be an idealistic
and benevolent goal although the perverted notion of such put forth
by some devolved politicians has set back an constructive progress in that
direction considerably. The League of Nations and, currently, the United
Nations are certainly steps in the right direction. The imposition of world
domination by economic, political, military, or theocratic coercion are
retrograde and primitive attempts doomed to well deserved failure. The conflicts
and wars covering the planet are, in their transparently theo-political
base, robot--like attempts to run the Realevolutionary videotape in
reverse and mark the beginning of a final, very slow denouement
of that godspell phenomenon.
To bring it down to the here and now: if America, or any country
or culture is going to be an example for the rest of the world, there
is no other choice but for it to set a Realevolutionary example and style.
It will require thinkers and scholars and innovators and futants from
every discipline in every culture and country and religion to assimilate
the vast amount of history, information, ooparts, traditions and technology
which have been rediscovered and recovered over the last one hundred
and fifty years from all parts of the world and to transform their religions
and cultures accordingly. How long will it take? The view from 2100 (A.D.)
sees it only begun in the 21st century and not totally completed by 2200.
Consciousness In, Consciousness
Out
The new paradigm, elucidating
our unique genesis and subsequent unique evolution (at least on this
planet: it may happen similarly with synthesized species elsewhere)
as, in a very real sense, an artificial intelligence, frees us to conceive
the real questions we need to ask ourselves and the answers not only
our science but the entire racial pool of experience and knowledge needs
to provide with regard to AI. One of the most important contributions
our restored history provides relates directly to the novel wild card
concept of self-aware artificial consciousness in that it furnishes
a wealth of information on the sociobiology of the creation of a synthetic
species and the resulting, evolving social relationship between the
creators and the created, between the Anunnaki and us.
Specifically, concerning the question as to whether Artificial
Intelligence can actually be achieved and how we should go about
it, our history is a strong source of a positive answer. The Anunnaki,
even while here, according to the recovered records of their deeds and
interactions, besides genetically inventing humans, quite clearly had
developed robots and androids, some of the latter being so sophisticated
that, it is written, it was difficult to tell one from a human or an
Anunnaki. We can profit from the Anunnaki’s experience in both creating
a new species and in their development and use of robots and sophisticated
androids as well as the awesome invention of a species such as we.
The realization of our half-alien genetic makeup and our relationship
to the Anunnaki stretches our perspective to afford an effective way
for us to begin to grasp the topic of alien presence on this planet.
It also enables a, previously unattainable, unassailable integrity individually
and as a race which will be essential to entering into direct contact
with alien species, either in the future or with ones that are already
here on the planet. We shall finally enter stellar society as a mature
race which knows who and what it is, what is good for it and what is not;
with whom or what it could interact, with whom and what it would be dangerous
to make contact; with the minimum of preconceptions as to how things should
be. Until we know who and what we are we will probably not be allowed into
stellar society. Until we break the godspell and stop looking up for Daddy
to come back, looking for some solution or salvation from outside, we will
be in danger of getting Borged by whomever shows up here. The topic of alien
contact is probably the most dramatic of examples of how narrow and primitive
our focus is. It is a fact and the gradual insinuation of it into our collective
consciousness has progressed in the last fifty years.
A Retrospective View From 2100
The elements that characterize
the new civilization are a collective, consensual awareness of our
generic humanity as a planetary unity, a recognition of a common, known
history from the beginning of the race as a genetically engineered species,
a globally common conception of human nature and its evolutionary direction,
a multi--dimensional sociobiology capable of reflexive self-analysis,
a psychology devoted to fostering the positive evolutionary development
of the individual over the entire spectrum of consciousness, a unified
scientific field expressed through a profound natural language based on
self-referential consciousness, an ecological, non-competitive, ubiquitously
helpful economics, an integral systems approach to the management of the
material realm, with the primary focus on the transcendental as the essential
human process.
With the demise of godspell religions and the dawning of a generic,
planetary, definition of human nature the social context and educational
process will undergo a profound revolution. The orientation will not
be to a creationist or a Darwinian evolutionary context but to
a generic, planetarily common realevolutionary context. We will be finally
free to understand our common species predecessors and our bicameral species
heritage in perspective. That perspective will afford us the detailed
information concerning the stages of developmental realevolution we have
passed through to this point. We will be able to understand and utilize
the realevolutionary map of those stages as laid out by Leary in the first-of-its-kind
schema in Appendix B and even better ones to follow.
The awareness of the historical stages and trajectory of
realevolution will make us conscious of the agenda of DNA, of our genetic
coding: survival and ever increasing conscious control over our
own existence. We might say that we are totally determined to determine
our own determination. Gene pools (groups throughout the population
that are predominantly programmed for certain functions for survival
of the species) will be recognized for what they are and valued.
Once conscious of the nature and purpose of these specialized populations
and how they map on to the stages of realevolution we will see that we
may move from gene pool to gene pool, adsorbing the ancient wisdom of
each for survival and personal learning and expansion. Moving from gene
pool to gene pool will be a natural process of an individual’s unique personal
realevolutionary process. There will be a mutual respect and positive recognition
between gene pools beyond just tolerance, and the only rule necessary
will be a consensually agreed prohibition of any gene pool doing anything
that will harm or obstruct the function of another gene pool. The gene pool
golden rule. It also brings us full circle around to the children, us in
the future. I project a realevolutionary scenario for the treatment and
education of the children of the 21st century to develop as follows.
A further refinement of the gene pool concept will be its incorporation
into the educational process: the stages of the recapitulatory developmental
process of the human child will be mapped onto the various gene pools
but without assigning hierarchical ranking to them. A child will have
the opportunity to experience the best features of the various phases
of human evolutionary experimentation. The quintessence of the hunter,
the gatherer, the agriculturist cultures presented by those steeped and
expert in the context will put the student in tune with deep genetic roots,
survival methods, cooperation and creativity. The crafts, industrial, mechanical,
engineering, construction, building gene pools; the arts, literary,
musical pools; the military, police, and civil servant gene pools all
have some essence of their orientation to reality to offer as insight
into a facet of human nature and ingenuity. The domestic, child-bearing
and rearing, cooperative, social, political, educational, pools will
certainly all contribute to the recapitulatory phases of a child’s development,
each at its proper time.
The children will be encouraged to be their own philosophers
from the earliest age according to their capacity at any age and stage.
They will be encouraged to make their own decisions about reality and
to explore and follow their own unique evolutionary development and to
respectfully make their unique contribution to the ongoing conversation
about the ideal trajectory of our collective species’ evolution. Language,
reason, logic will be understood to be a product of certain stages of
our realevolutionary perception of three dimensional reality. They will
be taught the nature of reality in the most expanded scientific and philosophical
context we know, and introduced to the concept of action which enhances others
while it enhances us. They will be enabled to continue the process of personal
realevolution on their own. In peace.
What to do after genetic enlightenment has broken the godspell,
the looking-to-the-sky-for-daddy-to-return, master-slave attitude, the,
deepest dye in the fabrics of all cultures? In the immediate future,
the god games we shall play as our own evolutionary artists are immortality
; self directed, conscious evolution; four-dimensional consciousness;
life under a law of everything; practical transcendence; the development
of AI as a subordinate species and for use in surrogate operations. For
starters. Physical immortality, possessed by the Nefilim, withheld from
humans, will be transformed, from “religious” afterlife reward to the
dominant characteristic of the dawning phase of our racial maturation.
We will be our own "gods", our own genetic credentials, play our own god
games with an unassailable species identity enabling us to step confidently
into stellar society.
But what of us individually? Once the ancient, subservient godspell
is dispelled we are freed, individually, to go one on one with the
universe. We will operate as our own "gods", according to our own genetic
credentials, play our own god games according to our own transcendental
choices, creating our own confident realities. We will perfect systematic
self-supersedure as a means of conscious evolution to an art form.
The characteristics that mark the new human are an unassailable
personal integrity, relativistic epistemology, profound compassion,
robust depth of informational data, understanding of the universe in
terms of a full unified field, broad-spectrum competence, transcendental
competition, facility in dimensional shifting, preference for dyadic operation,
a profound ability to enjoy, to play the games most enjoyable and satisfying
to generic "gods", an expanded capacity to literally have great fun creating
new realities, with the primary focus on the multi-dimensional. And to
play those “god” games in the context of relative immortality and, eventually,
habitual four-dimensional consciousness.
We have at hand the cumulative data and information to initiate
the planetary unification process. Let us make it so for the children.
This paper is copyrighted
by Neil Freer, but it may be freely downloaded, by the author’s permission
granted here, translated, printed, copied, quoted, distributed in any appropriate
media providing only that it not be altered in any way in text or intent
and the author is properly credited.
.
|